John Rollins, Ryder Cupper?

From the AP's Doug Ferguson:

John Rollins earned more Ryder Cup points (375) for winning the watered-down B.C. Open than Chris DiMarco earned (360) for being runner-up at the British Open.

DiMarco nearly chased down Tiger Woods at his best, making four birdies and two clutch par saves on the back nine at Royal Liverpool to close with a 68 and finishing two shots behind.

Across the ocean at the B.C. Open, a tournament rife with Nationwide Tour players and those without full status in the big leagues, Rollins rolled in a 5-foot birdie putt on the final hole for a one-shot victory over Bob May.

PGA president Roger Warren knew there was potential for such a scenario, but offered no apologies.

"It has drawn a lot of attention because it actually occurred," Warren said Monday night from Kiawah Island, S.C. "The interpretation of that as good or bad, I'm not going to get into that. The system was designed to make sure we had those players who were playing well in this year receiving points higher than the first year, so as to reward good play. And we wanted to make sure we placed a value on winning."

Both got into the top 10 in the U.S. standings -- DiMarco went from 21st to sixth place, while Rollins went from 39th to 10th. Four tournaments remain before the team is announced.

MacDuff's Post British/BC FedEx Cup Points Standings

fedexcuplogo.jpgIf the FedEx Cup ended today, Kent Jones would be in.

Just thought you'd rest easier knowing that.

1    Mickelson    23734        16
2    Furyk    23162.5        15
3    Singh    21859.37        16
4    Pettersson    19983.33        17
5    Gf. Ogilvy    19800        13
6    A.Scott    17325        12
7    Glover    17241.66        13
8    Donald    17176.87        12
9    Cink    17146.33        14
10    Immelman    17112.5        12
11    Weir    16984.37        15
12    Bohn    16838.33        16
13    Appleby    16437.5        13
14    Pampling    16372.5        15
15    Z.Johnson    16250        14
16    Toms    16196.87        11
17    Van Pelt    15940        17
18    Senden    15900        14
19    C.Campbell    15737.5        14
20    Pernice    15525        12
21    Mayfair    15329.16        16
22    T.Woods    15084.37        8
23    B. Quigley    15075        12
24    Verplank    15050        13
25    Sabbatini    14829.16        13
26    Oberholser    14637.5        13
27    Goosen    14350        11
28    T.Clark    14335        14
29    Olazabal    14187.5        11
30    Funk    14137.5        16
31    Gay    14037.5        14
32    Jerry Kelly    13675        12
33    Chopra    13633.07        15
34    J.Ogilvie    13396.78        14
35    Vn Taylor    13275        13
36    Choi    13125        13
37    Imada    13117.5        14
38    Crane    13060        13
39    Els    13040        12
40    D.Wilson    12700        14
41    Ames    12687.5        10
42    Allenby    12575        11
43    Hoffman    12575        14
44    Harrington    12450        10
45    S. Maruyama    12450        12
46    Purdy    12375        12
47    Slocum    12062.5        13
48    Love III    12050        12
49    Villegas    12037.5        13
50    Flesch    12030.71        17
51    Sluman    11875        16
52    Palmer    11741.66        13
53    N.Green    11740        14
54    JJ Henry    11662.5        10
55    Watney    11535.71        13
56    Branshaw    11520.83        12
57    Warren    11387.5        13
58    Herron    11247.5        12
59    Rollins    11225        11
60    Lehman    11075        11
61    Sean O'Hair    10949.5        13
62    Rose    10891.66        13
63    Garcia    10887.5        9
64    Austin    10862.5        15
65    Leonard    10820.83        12
66    Stricker    10800        9
67    Parnevik    10767.5        12
68    Bertsch    10668.75        14
69    Lonard    10610.71        13
70    Wetterich    10425        9
71    RS Johnson    10305        10
72    Bryant    10282        11
73    Hart    10255        11
74    Jobe    10067.5        12
75    Poulter    10062.5        10
76    DiMarco    9909.37        10
77    Dickerson    9866.07        12
78    G. Owen    9850        10
79    Curtis    9762.5        12
80    Maggert    9700        10
81    F.Jacobson    9675        10
82    JB Holmes    9658.33        10
83    D. Howell    9587.5        8
84    Azinger    9450        12
85    Kenny Perry    9375        11
86    Br.Davis    9342.5        11
87    Barlow    9325        12
88    Beem    9318.75        11
89    Mahan    9262.5        13
90    Gronberg    9200        11
91    Howell III    9187.5        14
92    Baird    9117.5        9
93    Waldorf    9087.5        11
94    Micheel    9075        10
95    Lowery    9062.5        11
96    Estes    8925        10
97    D. Maruyama    8766.07        11
98    Leaney    8712.5        9
99    Goggin    8600.25        7
100    Gore    8503.57        8
101    Andrade    8482.5        10
102    Couples    8437.5        10
103    Sutherland    8387.5        12
104    Calcavecchia    8292.5        15
105    B. Haas    8237.5        10
106    J.Smith    8237.5        11
107    Pavin    8200        8
108    Gove    8175        8
109    Bub Watson    8125        8
110    Franco    8112.5        9
111    Lickliter II    7925        10
112    Kaye    7900        11
113    Cabrera    7862.5        7
114    Olin Browne    7812.5        13
115    Sindelar    7787.5        12
116    Bjornstad    7742.5        11
117    Cook    7700        8
118    Geiberger    7481.25        11
119    Overton    7341.07        12
120    Fischer    7325        10
121    Triplett    7208.33        9
122    Atwal    7162.5        8
123    Faxon    7125        10
124    O'Hern    7100        5
125    Langer    7079.16        9
126    Baddeley    6962.5        8
127    JL Lewis    6937.5        11
128    M.Wilson    6902.5        8
129    J.Byrd    6862.5        5
130    Barron    6606.25        9
131    Kendall    6498.21        8
132    Frazar    6462.5        9
133    Armour III    6425        8
134    Pat Perez    6350        8
135    Kent Jones    6312.5        9
136    Durant    6281.25        13
137    S.Jones    6280        11
138    Westwood    6150        6
139    Allen    6075        10
140    K. Cox    6037.5        6
141    Stankowski    6028        10
142    Gamez    5962.5        10
143    Matteson    5925        10
144    David Duval    5875        9

Tell Me What You See

I promise, that's the last obscure Beatles reference in a post title.

230136-404284-thumbnail.jpg
Aerial View Of No. 17 (click image to enlarge)
Anyway, the miracle that Google Earth is, the Hoylake aerial photo is not out of focus as I originally thought, but very much in tact and showing...yes, the old 17th green that was taken out by Donald Steel a few years ago.

Playing as the first hole in this year's Open Championship, the original 17th was an H.S. Colt-designed number perched on Stanley Road, where the occasional putt on the back portion of the green could conceivably roll out of bounds.

SI Golf Plus readers know that we featured it as the finisher on our recent Colt Dream 18, in part to highlight one of the great architectural crimes of the new century.230136-404293-thumbnail.jpg
No. 17 and Stanley Road (click on image to enlarge)

230136-404297-thumbnail.jpg
No. 17 up close (click on image to enlarge)
Imagine how fun it would be if they returned the original routing at Hoylake to not only put back the infamously difficult finish written about by Darwin and company, while also returning a genuine road hole that would give Hoylake the classic hole that it currently lacks.

Key word there, imagine. Because it probably won't happen. 

 

"Another week, another Carolyn Bivens controversy"

Jay Coffin writing in Golfweek:

This time, the LPGA commissioner bailed on a July 20 Tournament Owners Association meeting at the last moment, saying she was uncomfortable with the situation. Bivens made her decision moments before she was to board an airplane heading for Denver, and she told several other LPGA staff members they were not permitted to attend. One senior staffer was at the Denver airport when Bivens made the decision, and the staff member immediately returned to the tour's Daytona Beach, Fla., headquarters.
And this is nice...
"The performance of the TOA board over the last couple of weeks is beginning to cause some serious dissection," Bivens told Golfweek July 20.
Dissection?
"The only way the LPGA and TOA as a group can have a relationship is if it is based on trust. I don't feel as if there has been full disclosure."

Bivens had a 2,800-word speech prepared for the TOA meeting – a copy of which was obtained by Golfweek – where she planned to set the record straight by going point-by-point through "misconceptions or differences that have been reported." The subjects included Bivens' strategic plan, the 2007 schedule, new sanction fees, tour finances and the characterization of Bivens' relationship with the TOA.

Under the latter heading, Bivens wrote, "I have repeatedly left meetings and conversations with many of you feeling energized about our future together, and comfortable that I have shared the LPGA's goals and direction in detail. Yet I turn around and read articles that depict a much different picture. This sort of public outcry does not have the LPGA or its players as the primary focus. One can only conclude there are individual agendas at work.
And she even gets all Freudian on them.
"The passive-aggressive dealings of the TOA leadership are not healthy and are not in the best interests of the LPGA and anyone associated with our organization."

You go Carolyn! 

I Don't Want To Spoil The Party...

My initial jubilation at Hoylake's successful rewarding of strategic play was tempered a bit after talking to a trusted observer. This chap knows the course well and despised the R&A's juggling of the closing holes.

And, like Tiger hinted, this observer felt that the over-the-top weekend hole locations were designed for one purpose: to keep scoring in check so that we would not notice that technology has rendered Hoylake irrelevant.

Me, being the eternal optimist, insisted that too many positives remain. Namely, that brown, firm golf on a well-designed course created an ideal model for tournament golf, especially since it rewarded such intelligent and measured play from Tiger.

But what if the R&A had made the hole locations a bit more accessible Saturday and Sunday, and Tiger wins at 24 under, with two other players around 20 under?

Would Ron Whitten be considered a prophet for declaring the course outdated?

I'm starting to think so, especially after reading this heartburn inducer from Alistair Tait of Golfweek. 

All the talk about scores reaching 20-under-par proved to be hot air. Sure the winning score was 18-under-par, just one stroke short of Woods' Open Championship record set at St. Andrews in 2000.

So what? The fact Woods emerged with the Jug proves the course passed the test. Had it been Joe Bloggs from anywhere or everywhere, then it would have been a different story.

So much for all the worry about the quirky nature of the golf course – the internal out of bounds, the three undulating greens that stuck out like old range balls in a bucket full of new Titleists.

Hoylake proved this week that it has enough natural defences to withstand the talents of the game's greatest players.

Course playing too short? No problem. Just tuck the pins.

That's what the R&A did this week. They put pins on the front of greens, had holes cut close to the side of greens so that a boldly struck putt could run off the greens.

See why I'm not feeling so good about this now.

More Final Open Championship Reads

openlogo.jpgSI.com's Gary Van Sickle tells us what we learned from the Open. Ken Brown pens a piece for the Telegraph and believes Tiger's performance was the most impressive since Faldo at St. Andrews. He also writes about the one drive Tiger did hit, with the ball speed (191 mph).

James Corrigan says Hoylake was a big success and may next see the Open in 2016. Lewine Mair talks to the R&A's Martin Kippax about Tiger's strategy.

Barker Davis writes in the Washington Times about the low scoring and says, big deal.

"At the end of the day, a win is a win, and it doesn't matter if it is at 5-under par or 20-under par," Goosen said. "At a major championship, you are always going to see the top players rise to the top, and that is what you are seeing already. If it's 20 under, it's 20 under. Who cares, as long as we have a good champion."

The USGA, of course, operates as if it has no such concerns, annually converting a venerable track perfectly capable of defending itself into a torture chamber demanding defensive golf.
Unlike the British Open, which always (forgiving Canoustie) relies solely on the elements for protection, the U.S. Open specializes in contrivance -- single-file fairways, graduated rough and greens crustier than month-old pizza.

As a result, the U.S. championship is routinely the dullest major of the year, an interminable par-fest that is entertaining for only about 45 minutes every Father's Day during the inevitable stretch-run debacle (see Phil Mickelson, Colin Montgomerie, etc.).


U.S. Open's aren't won; they are survived. Name the last player to win a U.S. Open by making a birdie on the last hole.

He also pulls this beautiful quote out of Dan Jenkins, who sadly did not have the space to include such a rant in his August Golf Digest recap of the U.S. Open (it's not posted online and not listed in the table of contents, but I know it's there because I read it at the beach today):

"They talk all that nonsense about identifying the best player, and then they give you Steve Jones or Michael Campbell or Andy North or Lee Janzen. Great, how'd you do those weeks?" said Dan Jenkins, the planet's dean of golf writers, scoffing at the USGA from an ocean away yesterday. "[Heck], the U.S. Open gave us Jack Fleck, the worst result in the history of sports by a nudge over the zebras giving gold to the Russians. ... The USGA hasn't identified the best players. All they've done is make the Open unwatchable.

And finally, there's a story that really didn't get much attention because I think many of us were enthralled with Tiger Woods' performance. It'll be interesting to see if the weeklies take a tougher look at the R&A's hole locations over the weekend, which apparently were Meeksian in character.

From Mark Garrod on SportlingLife.com

Although Hoylake undoubtedly lacks the "wow" factor of some other Open venues Woods stated: "With the course being this fast it lent itself to just amazing creativity.

"Granted, if you would have had easier pins I'm sure it (the scoring) would have gone lower - these are the most difficult pins (hole locations) I've ever seen at an Open championship.

"A couple of times you feel like if you hit a putt too hard you'll actually putt it right off the green and you never have that feeling at an Open. But this week it was certainly the case.

"I think because the yardage played short because it was so fast - you hit three-wood, driver 380 yards and you're going to have a lot of short irons - the only defence they had was pin locations and hard, dry conditions.

"We couldn't really go all that low."

Eighteen under kept things respectable and the fact that nobody scored lower than 65 when all the talk was of a possible first 62 in major golf history then Hoylake could not be described as being brought to its knees.

Hmmm...so the R&A does or does not care about scoring?

Liverpool, Cell Phones In The Rota

Peter Dawson tells Norman Dabell that Hoylake is in.

"Royal Liverpool is now back on that rota," he said.

And more importantly, we get to enjoy more years of interrupted play because the R&A doesn't want to put people through the awfulness of being checked for oh, cameras, purple paint bombs, weapons, etc...

And I'm hoping they'll do something about the golf ball...

 Dawson also said that despite growing concern over interruptions from mobile telephones and photographers, the R&A were determined not to introduce similar security controls used at the US Masters and US Open.

Woods and his final round playing partner Sergio Garcia were continually interrupted by amateur photographers, many using mobile phone cameras, on Sunday.

Both players complained about the interruptions and the matter was raised at the R&A's media conference.

Director of Championships David Hill said they felt electronic screening of spectators before they entered the course was not a step they wanted to take.

"As it was shown at the US Open, it will mean 20-30 minute delays at the entrances. We would rather encourage people not to use cameras and mobile phones on the course," said Hill.

"Confiscation is a problem, too. Just collecting the phones and cameras afterwards can mean quite a messy situation.

Not as messy as purple paint, or God help them, something that actually does real damage.


Watson: "it's too late to do much now"

An unbylined Unison.ie story features Tom Watson's latest thoughts on the equipment issue.

The Great Man, hugely popular with the galleries wherever he plays, got up close and personal with some of the heavy hitters of the modern game and saw power unleashed that left him reeling in shock and awe - as in "aw crap, I'm too old for this stuff."

Watson knows what it's like to thump a ball a country mile down a fairway. In his day he asserted: "I was a long hitter," but conceded: "I saw a difference this week."

"During the week I played with Vijay Singh and Retief Goosen. I played with Brett Wetterich and with Chad Campbell, and these guys bomb it out there.

"I mean they're 80 yards ahead of me. I can understand people saying maybe the equipment has got too far ahead, but these guys swing the club a lot faster than I do.

"I'm out there waving at it, these guys are ripping at it. I just can't swing the club that fast.
Well Tom, they are younger than you too.
"What I think has happened also is that the ball has outgunned the R&A and the USGA.

"Back in 2001 a big jump happened then. The manufacturers played by the rules but the R&A and the USGA didn't have the rules in place to prevent the ball jumping ahead in distance.

"I think it's too late to do much now, but there are a few things they could do. One might be to reduce the size of the clubheads on the drivers, so you can't sling it with total abandon. With these drivers you can mis-hit the ball and still hit it a long way.

"Maybe they could get away from the square grooves so you can't spin the ball in the rough and put the old 'V' grooves back where you don't have the same control out of the rough.

"One thing I'm not in favour of is a special ball for tournament golf. I wouldn't like to see that. I like the competition between the manufacturers and it's good for the players."

So we know something happened a few years ago, we know it's bad, and we should correct other elements to compensate?  

Jack: I Could Have Won 25

Paul Forsyth pulls all sorts of fun stuff out of Jack Nicklaus, who was in one of his chatty moods at the Open Championship. On his 18 majors:
“Once I got past that record, I didn’t have a big push to do much else,” he says. “I didn’t know I had Tiger Woods pushing me. I would have probably worked harder and maybe won more if I had. I can’t say I prepared for every major the way I should have. I can’t say that I didn’t give away opportunities. Records were never really that important to me until it was too late to go back and go for them.

“Never in my life did I add up how many I had won. Tiger has been adding from day one. He has grown up that way, and the more he does it, the more he is reminded of it. He doesn’t know anything else.”

And...
Nicklaus is proud of his majors, but there are more important things. “To me, my record is 18 professional majors, five kids, 46 years of marriage, 19 grandkids and a successful business. I have other friends, I have enjoyed what I have done, and I have been able to smell the flowers along the way. Those are the things that are important to me, not the 18 majors. The 18 majors are not my life, they are part of it.

“If I had been really serious about building a record that nobody was going to touch, I wouldn’t have been able to do a lot of the other things I have enjoyed. I have had a very balanced life.

“I spend time with my kids, I have grown up knowing them, and if golf had been the only thing I did, that wouldn’t have happened. I could have won 20 or 25 majors, but I think I would have been a miserable person.”

The implication is that Woods, whose late father compared him to Gandhi, is not on this earth to have a good time. Should the world No 1 successfully defend his title at Royal Liverpool this afternoon, the biggest prize will not be the Claret Jug, which he has won twice already, but the fact that it will take him to within seven majors of the holy grail. From the moment he pinned the Nicklaus record on his bedroom wall, his only dream has been to achieve immortality.

“Tiger is a pretty well- balanced kid, who likes to do other things, like diving and fishing, but he is living in a fishbowl. He can’t go anywhere without people reminding him who he is and what he is here for. I never used to worry about anything like that. I could go to any restaurant and nobody bothered me. He’s like a rock star. They’re on top of him all the time. I wouldn’t trade my life for his, not for any money you want to name.”
And this is fun, considering he'll be President's Cup captain again in 2007:
“In this year’s US Open, six of the top 10 were foreign players, and so were 14 of the top 20. We have some very good players, but if you look past Tiger, Phil (Mickelson) and Jim Furyk, it’s pretty thin.”

Neither is he especially impressed with the Europeans, save for a select two or three. Nicklaus, who is captain of the US Presidents Cup team, says the world’s best players are from neither continent.

“There are more good world players than there are US and European players combined. Maybe, in the Ryder Cup, it should be the US and Europe versus the rest of the world.”

Open Championship Final Reads Vol. 1

openlogo.jpgFor those of you who didn't get to see The Golf Channel's "Nike Roundtable" segments from Hoylake featuring Stephen Ames, David Duval, Paul Casey and Stewart Cink answering Rich Lerner's questions, all I can say is, pray for a DVD. Though no price could be put on a 2-disc set of this charismatic and humble foursome discussing the key issues facing the game, we can always hope (that it'll cost less than those Hoylake limited edition photos they were peddling all week).

Ah, but you ask, how about The Open won by Tiger Woods doing Ben Hogan better than Ben Hogan. Yes that was pretty neat, as Lawrence Donegan writes:

Woods, who won at the Old Course of St Andrews last year, is the first player to defend his Open title since Tom Watson in 1982. He has now won three Opens and barring illness, injury or a sudden desire to pursue a career on the stage, he will win a handful more, not least because his contemporaries tend to shrivel at the crux, their talents disappearing into the black hole of Wood's presence.

At the start of the week he formulated a plan for negotiating Hoylake's tight, running links - long-irons off the tee, long-iron to the green -and stuck to it rigidly throughout, even when he found himself as much as 50 yards behind his playing partners on some holes. On a course like this control, not distance is what counts and, as the old golfing phrase goes, Woods had his ball on a string. Over the first nine holes yesteday he had eight tap-in pars and, courtesy of the 30-foot putt that fell into the centre of the cup at the par-five 8th hole, an eagle.
Come on, Hoylake played a big part in this too. This less-than-sexy links proved why Low and Darwin and Dickinson wrote about it years ago. So Peter Corrigan decided to bring up Ron Whitten's Golf Digest story, which definitely won't be remembered like the works of the aforementioned.
Among the most satisfied will be those happy to be described as crusty traditionalists. For this tournament was a throwback to the days when golf's problems couldn't be solved by graphite shafts, titanium faces or self-propelled balls. The course needed thought not torque; guile and gumption not power and passion. And while the figure of Tiger Woods was awesomely dominant, the rheumy-eyed could still visualise the long grey beard and top-buttoned tweed jacket of Old Tom Morris, the ghost of Opens past.
And this is really funny...
I spoke the other day to Golf Digest's esteemed editor, Jerry Tarde, who doesn't necessarily agree with the views of his contributors but pointed out that Whitten is regarded as the world's foremost expert on golf architecture.
And Jerry, who was it who branded him that?
That probably makes his words even more depressing, because if he is an example of golf's modern visionaries, the old-fashioned fraternity must fear for the future.

After rubbishing Hoylake he went on to predict that "sooner or later, every Open course will become obsolete, the Old Course at St Andrews included".

What! Every links course around these shores? The very foundations of the game to become museum pieces? He neglects to say what sort of courses will supersede them for eminence.

The Telegraph's Martin Johnson salutes Tiger and Hoylake, and sadly, gets it right about American golfers too.
Hoylake, a thinker's golf course, attracted the usual nonsensical criticism from some Americans, including the author of an article in Golf Digest with the headline "Royal Out Of Bounds". They really don't get it over there. Unless a course is full of palm trees, dyed blue water and motorised cart tracks they think the place must be a municipal pitch and putt. But it's their loss.
And...
Gary Player has been here watching and, in between his customary routine of telling everyone that four million press-ups before breakfast is the way to eternal youth, he hasn't particularly enjoyed watching Woods hitting iron after iron. "It's not very exciting for the galleries, and I'm quite sure the crowds would have loved to see him booming the driver," Player said. "Mind you, the way technology is going, I promise you this. In 100 years' time they'll be saying, 'That Tiger Woods was a helluva player. But wasn't he a short hitter!'."

The crowds might well have preferred to watch Woods booming it out there, but this tournament continues to attract galleries so enthusiastic that there was even a crush around the practice area yesterday morning to watch Retief Goosen chipping. In the list of unexplained mysteries, this would rank somewhere between the Mary Celeste and the Bermuda Triangle.
Lynne Truss of Eats, Shoots and Leaves fame knows her golf as evidenced in this examination of Sergio's lousy Sunday at the Open.
Woods grows in stature exponentially, and he continues to make terrific golfers look completely ordinary. Maybe the yellow outfit was not just a sartorial mistake on García’s part; maybe it was meant to be a secret weapon, to make Woods think continually, “But why? Why wear yellow? Even the hat?” But even that failed to put him off his stroke.
Speaking of Sergio, thanks to reader Van for this Graham Spiers story in the Herald:
Yet following his round, it was almost as if Garcia's personal psychologist had grabbed him on his way to meet the media and told him: "Don't be negative. Don't be down on yourself. Talk yourself up." Because what we encountered was a young man with a strange set of comments on a very poor final day, and never more so than on the green.

"I hit some great putts today and I felt very good with my putter," said Garcia. "I hit some great putts that just didn't want to go in. That's the best I've felt with my putter, but they just kept lipping out."
Then, most bizarrely of all given this last-round lack of a challenge, was this from Garcia. "This shows me that when I'm in this position the next time, I can handle it."

Putting, in the wider context of golf, is a complex matter. We know this because, earlier this week, Peter Thomson claimed "never" to have been "a good putter", and Thomson won the Open five times between 1954 and 1965.

Yet the fact remains, this duel yesterday between Woods and Garcia delivered a cruel lesson. While Garcia's putts wouldn't drop, those of Woods in the main usually did. In truth, over these five hours over Hoylake, we saw why Woods is a great golfer, and why Garcia is merely a very good one.
We also saw again why Woods is a godsend to the world of sport. He has now won 11 majors, seven short of his ambition of equalling and beating Jack Nicklaus' magical record of 18. Up there, Earl Woods will be excited by the chase.

In a business renowned for its crocodile tears, not all emotion in sport is contrived or artificial: anyone who witnessed Tiger Woods disintegrate into uncontrollable sobs after winning the 135th Open at Hoylake last night will testify to it. For Woods, this was a win imbued with special feeling.
In the odds and ends department, Ed Sherman offers his birdies and bogies from Sunday's round. Like many writers, he's not wild about Sergio's outfit that appears to have come from one of Doug Saunders' garage sales.

And here's an AP story on the purple paint vandalism.

Finally, Paul MacInnes writes about the spat between the BBC's Peter Alliss and Gary Lineker, which will mean something to those of you lucky enough to watch the BBC's weekday coverage:
But sometimes the crunchiest matters cannot be avoided and so the question must be asked: do Peter Alliss and Gary Lineker get on? Ever since this month's issue of Golf International hit the shelves, it has been clear that the pair are not seeing eye to eye. In a sizzling Alliss exclusive, the Voice of Golf said of Lineker and his infamous Masters debut: "He's very good at reading the autocue. Knowing how nervous he was, I'd have given him a seven out of 10."

Tiger's Post Final Round Q&A

After the round, a few good questions and answers:

Q. Can you talk about the genesis of your strategy to not hit driver this week? You had said that you didn't know much about this course. Did you read about it on the flight over?

TIGER WOODS: Nope.

Q. It was just when you first got here. Was there a moment when it happened?

TIGER WOODS: No. As I was playing the golf course, I would hit a couple of drives, and the driver would go 350, 370 yards. How can you control that out here? You can't control that. The fairways become they're hard enough to hit as it is, and you add driver and they go that far, now how hard is it to hit? So I just felt in the end if you stayed out of the bunkers this entire week and had just a decent week on the greens, I felt that I would be in contention on the back nine.

And I hit the ball well the entire week and I felt like I had wonderful touch on the greens, except for the last nine holes yesterday. Other than that, I felt that my strategy was sound. It was going to keep me out of trouble.

Guys who were trying to hit the ball over the bunkers, they're going to have shorter clubs on the greens, no doubt about that, but a lot of these flags you can't attack with wedges. On 4, I had I'm aiming 30 feet left of the hole, and I couldn't keep it on the greens. That's the nature of the golf course and the way it was playing this week.

I felt the conservative approach was the way to go. And it lent itself to that this week, especially with four par 5s. And you figure if you just handle the par 5s, that's 16 under par right there. You sprinkle in a few more here and there around the golf course and you're looking pretty good.

Q. Has Hoylake stood the test of time and should The Open come back here, and if so, why?

TIGER WOODS: I think it's a fantastic test. With the golf course being this fast, it lent itself to just amazing creativity. Granted, if you would have had easier pins I'm sure it would have gone lower. These are the most difficult pins I've ever seen at an Open Championship. And a couple of times you feel like if you hit a putt too hard you'll actually putt it right off the green, and you never have that feeling at an Open. But this week it certainly was the case.

And I think because the yardage played short, in some cases, because it was so fast, you hit 3 wood, driver, hitting it 380 yards down there, you're going to have a lot of short irons in there. The only defense they had was pin locations and hard, dry conditions. And we couldn't really go all that low.

Q. Should it come back here?

TIGER WOODS: Yes.
And here he talks about controlling spin into the greens:
Q. Your strategy off the tee and having to hit all the long irons sort of takes for granted the fact that you have to be hitting your long irons really well. How well were you hitting them? How tough might it have been if you weren't, especially your approaches?

TIGER WOODS: As far as my control, probably one of the best ball striking weeks I've ever had, as far as control. That's shaping the ball, moving my traj and different heights and really controlling my spin going into the greens. It wasn't getting away from me. Yeah, probably one of the best ball striking weeks I've ever had.

If I wasn't hitting it well, as you alluded to, it would have been pretty difficult around here. This golf course you had to really control your ball in order to have a chance. And I was able to do that the entire week.

Also you have to remember that if you're with the flags the way we they were, you're going to have a bunch of 40 and 50 footers, and my pace was good all week. A bunch of tap ins, my pace was really, I felt, sound all week, especially today when I really needed it. I had a lot of kick ins and putts that I thought I made just kind of skirt off on the edge.

 

Got To Get You Out Of My Life

Let's get right to the good stuff:

Clampett on the preparation Phil Mickelson will take for the PGA Championship in Medinah, IL: “I think he’ll get there very early.  His whole focus after this championship will be on Medinah.”

Profound.

Clampett on Sergio Garcia being paired with Tiger Woods for the final round of play:  “I think it’s going to be intimidating for Sergio to play with the world’s number one player, especially Tiger.  Look at Tiger’s record, the last 10 times he’s held a 54-hole lead he’s gone on to win.”

Gosh, I wish I had said that.

Clampett on Luke Donald:  “He’s like a duck on the water, he looks calm on the outside but he’s paddling like hell underneath.”

Bet you can't wait for the PGA!

Hoylake The Winner?

1.jpgNearly every major venue of late where the winning score has been kept below double digits under par has been declared the answer to modern technology. (Even as surprise winners and unsastisfying finishes clearly occurred due bizarre and extreme setups.)

But at Hoylake as with St. Andrews, we finally witnessed a venue that, left relatively in tact, tested all aspects of a player's game and produced a leaderboard of diverse styles.

Though it likely would have been a far more fascinating design with the ball rolled back 25 yards and the landing zones widened a bit to allow for even more strategic tee shot placement (maybe tempting Tiger into more drivers), Hoylake proved that fast and firm golf mixed with thought-provoking architecture can still produce a great championship, assuming that the committee in charge can look past the dastardly, horribly humiliating, sheer awfulness of an 18-under par winning score.

I know I can. Unfortunately, our governing bodies and many golf fans all too often can not get past that.
 

You've Got To Hide Your Driver Away?

Another question after Tiger's brilliant retro performance: why didn't more players approach Hoylake the way Tiger did (long irons off tees)?

Is it because they hit their drivers straighter than Tiger?

Or because they have a different philosophy and aren't as confident in their long irons?

Or is he just that much more shrewd than everyone else?